How do we enage all economists in waving over from tghe maths of the big gets biggers to the maths of enabling all peoples (and global villages they network through) to have access to being as productive as their hearts and minds content

Here's an emerging scripts which I am trying out on serious economics networks. To engage I need to find when they are talking about one of the revolutionary family of terms such as singularity 1 2, tipping point, gathering storm, or death of distance which my family (dad then his 30th something year at The Economist as its most prolific editorial writer) coined and nurture since 1984

Even though I hold a postgraduate certificate in mathematical statistics from Cambridge, I am not sure of the logical nuances connecting large scale change visions such as singularity, tipping point etc . However may I point out that I believe that linguistically the economics epicentre of such system * system transformation is Entrepreneurial Revolution. We are scripting 30th birthday party dialogues around this through 2006. My dad, Norman Macrae, surveyed ER 30 years back in The Economist 1976 and also began a preneurial trilogy. Here is a brief map of what economists who connect ER ideas can see. Equally I myself am delighted to work on any contexts or cross-disciplinary and systemic constructs that facilitate working around the same sort of map

Survey 1 ER : the word preneur (French for taking back) goes back to when the French peoples took back land etc from royalty so that the peopes of France could be more productive. The Economist itself was found in the 1840s by what would be today called a social entrepreneur world champion http://clubofoxford.blogspot.com. Those of a preneurial persuasion remind editors of The Economist to this day that: James said that once corn laws and capital punishment had been repealed , the newspaper should be closed! http://ecosaintjames.blogspot.com

Entrepreneurial Revolution looked back at the industrial age to see what organisations had already looked at ways of going beyond people being subservient to machines. My dad’s surveys had discovered Japan in 1962- so clearly some companies like Toyota make factory life more fulfilling than others like GM? Other oddities explored in this survey included how much innovation got blocked by patents; what will industries or nations do when they need to criss-cross each other’s boundaries but are 100% defending their own territories and able to collaborate.

Survey 2 called “We’re All Intrapreneurial Now” celebrated the fact that around this time in advanced nations the majority of the economy had changed to service with a big question: What revolution to the system of organisational valuation and governance is needed for people to be invested in more than machines. Intangibles savvy leaders and goverance systems know there is a golden triangle of service economics but only if a corporation is prepared to sustain the highest trust-flows through a generation of service work. Companies like South West Airlines have tacitly used this sustainability investment dynamic to return 100 fold to shareholders over a generation but only because they multiplied far more value than that across the societies they became most interdependent with

In 1984, we came to the book which started the future history genre of exploring worldwide networking crises of human fulfilment. This book completed the Preneurial trilogy advancing constructs now termed social or sustainability entrepreneurs and was co-authored by me because my first job in the 1970s had been in The Uk’s National Development program for computer assisted learning networks. Our 2024 report (republished depending on language translations as 2025 or 2026 reports) timelined how the generation 1984-2024 would face the greatest revolutions humankind has ever been hit by combining economic singularities in the costs of transport and communications. We timelined 7 “Death of Distance” waves – each that will connect all 6 billion beings and the 2 million global villages they network through. Each wave will either sustain growth everyone it goes or compound economic and social destruction. There’s nothing magic about 7 – happy to map more with people. The idea that waves such as these are enveloping us all –eg education, clean energy, cross-cultural embedding so as to ending underclasses and apartheids everywhere on the globe… and are multiple but interconnecting is what you need to start out mapping futures of global and local economics with. The more I look at the 7 waves that our dialogue groups have been monitoring since 1984 the more I personally see similar death of distance patterns as Friedman’s :Flat World http://clubofbethesda.blogspot.com

*Collaboration as a higher order advantage than competition alone

*Competition theory that is incorrect in compound consequences it compounds because of various false assumptions of which the simplest is: no cost of propagating something that the whole world is dying out to be invented, where the actual costs of traditional media are huge

*Reconfirmation of a topic my dad and Peter Drucker used to talk about a lot. There are in what we exponentially compound 2 economics with opposite maths: that of the big gets bigger and the peoples economics which unites all peoples in access and capability of making a difference – for want of a better term I will call that peoples economics. Globalisation’s singularity is which of these 2 economics will connect through all the systems*systems that networks consequentalise. By 2024, we will know and the fate of our children’s generations will be immovable. When Bush’s State of the Union speech declares the 2 new space races of end addiction to petroleum economics and enable our kids to love exploring science as much as sports, those contexts are dead on 2 of our waves. But there may yet be a lot of work to do to ensure the curve each waves propagates uptilt every society’s sustainability instead of downtilting all places, societies and all cultures. What can economists bring to this debate now so that everyone transparently understands the crossroads we fly over through this next decade?

* I am searching for a perfectly simple collaboration game. A worldwide treasure hunt where the winners are the greatest open source collaborators. I suspect the context may revolve round http://www.frappr.com/algaeworld

Discovering a perfect collaboration context -and simple enough debating game around it - is what really seems to matter gravitationally and urgently.http://cleanestdemocracy.blogspot.com