Primary mathematical considerations
Piloting luncheon formats for urgently celebrating sustainability investment with Dr Yunus
Worldwide questions to The Economist:Do you have a collaboration "best for world" vision for UK, London and the leadership debates that the village of ecosaintjames stages?
continued lower down
Blog * Villager Notesecosaintjames * 1
Aldwich? FutureofLondon * 2
Open Quaker Circle, aka Euston Square * 3
Angel's Hub (aka The COOPERATION, Islington) * 4
Balham's Nightingales (aka Search Theresa) * 5
From the Networkers Guide to Citiesâ Villages
-we welcome collaboration suggestions on: how to improve practises of leaders and peoples who feel interconnected by this scriptâ¦chris macrae wcbn007@easynet.co.uk
Ecosaintjames is suitably placed to link together the palaces, clubs and gardens of old money to the longest term investment strategies that sustain the commonwealth of generations and nations. The speculative 20 something MBA that may be the darling of merchant bankers would quickly be seen through as a bubble waiting to burst.
Old money waves its advantageous flows interlocally and worldwide provided that the good and the deeply cross-cultural always have diverse social spaces to question the great. This is a quality that the worldâs biggest kingdom stewarded by queen , queen mothers and princesses has given Britain a curious power to do as its late 20th century learnt from the dreadful conflicts its 19th C Empire festered (sadly still lurking in many corrupting boundaries of who lords what in Africa to this day)
Whilst the United Kingdom and Ireland as historic lands tying the masses have been anything but united, they do now look more harmoniously bound to sustaining each otherâs greater futures than any cluster of European Union countries. This is not a thing for national leaders to boast about, rather an inspiration for all collaboration knowledge city netizens cheerled by ethical global ambassadors of the stature of Mary Robinson to collaboratively celebrate, as well as enjoy mapping how Death of Distance reconciliation revolves around spread of ethnicities worldwide and has so made the British invention of www a transparency searcherâs paradise.. My x times great grand father was a minister who tried to save the peoples of the Isle of Arran from a short term global accountant who advised the lord that sheep would be more profitable. The people walked from hours every Sunday, from all round the isle to commune - though some were exported to Australia for their troubles, a place where Scottish clans still thrive; and youth and professions plant humanityâs deepest collaboration networks permitting Londoners to linkin active branches 1 2. The next para may navigate how Eastern hemispheres of goodwill also resonate through London albeit in second looping ways that DNA helix patterns are known for.
On the Industrial revolutionâs global credit side: the English language remains the lingua franca of networks and software developers and the great good sense of Gandhi has sustained the transformation of Raj through Indiaâs cross-cultural independence to be the one country that I would love any child I advise to learn from most 1 2 . And who knows how entrepreneurial histories of China would have turned out if Hong Kong had not had enjoyed such an open opprtunity to be Chinese Asiaâs leading test village for bridging entrepreneurs from West and East, North and South.
During world war 2, Eisenhower used Norfolk House in ecosaintjames as its operational centre (see this Amazing grace with which GIâs were instructed in those days) and long after Winston Churchill was know to swim at the RAC club in Pall mall (one of the first indoor pools sported by a club)
The modern day tourist may love :the royal parks â I never understood the exuberance of Wordsworths; daffodils until I met the tall wild kind one spring day in Green Park. The ceremonies of lands of hope and glory still fan out of Buckingham place. The 3 church boulevards that Buckingham palace almost forms the roundabout of : Victoria Cathedral , Westminster Abbey and furthers away St Pauls, and recently a new innovation : the Ministry of Peace constituted with the support of simultaneous policy advocates and others to sit one evening a month at the Houses of Parliament.
By serendipity (or maybe the Rothschilds looking after their money further than any one generation can see ) , The Economist moved in the early 60s? from the media centre Londonâs collaboration networks dub the Future of London âthat end of Fleet street where lay the HQ of BBC (worldâs largest public broadcaster), a building shared with Londonâs jewel in the crown gateway (Indiaâs embassy), around whose Somerset House where births were recorded and constitutional law drafted, where London Schooled economists to StJames.
Ecosaintjames got off to an uneasy start when it was found that a skyscraperâs roof the height of The Economistâs new building could be a direct line of telescope sight to the Royal bedrooms. Privacy was granted but by decree no other building in St James would be built so high again, and the key to the roof to be kept in the editorâs safe. This lucky matter ensured that The Economistâs tangible property was always wealthy enough to ensure its journalists were never beholden to short-term pressures of advertising monies. Their inquiring zeal was free to question global powers unlike any other newspaper medium. So, The Economist continued what it had been founded around by James Wilson in the 1840s â the first and allcomers greatest media social entrepreneur : the peoples economics may never win a Nobel prize but unlike many academics it is never funded to develop the dismal science economics school of maths designed around compounding how the big get bigger.
Friday luncheons, after Thursdayâs bedding of the weekly newspaper, also became an institution where almost any world leader of national or corporate complexion visiting town could revel in a private debate with off-the-record editorial teams. Moreover, the collegiate (non individually branded) writings of The Economist enabled a different style than individuals making a name for themselves. Some of these styles of exuberant curiosity have sustained over many decades and lifetimes: Matt (now Viscount) Ridleyâs open inquiries of science being what any school teacher should link curricula to; Future history and social entrepreneurial revolution journalism have never had a greater archives from foundation of The Economist to the 1980s when the final death of distance preneurial revolutions were chartered for one and all to explore as the 1984-2024 generation takes the final test in sustaining investment in humanity
This brings us 2005: the year that âdeath of distance scenario debatesâ since 1984 have forecast as manâs most dangerous , the final crossroads in deciding whether to make extreme poverty history. And why the Queens end of 2005 Commonwealth speech needs to be re-read with due diligence when she asks is humanity turing on itself. After 2005, London will redouble ist efforts to earn its current leading worldwide role as collaboration knowledge city.
When we look now at the few in Ecosaintjames, assisted by such extraordinary commonwealth waves as the Canadian-born architectural network of photosynthesis as the clean energy that can change the worldâs footprint at a stroke- who are deeply planting sustainability investment today, we may wonder whether for once Winston was only half right- never in the history of human kind has so much been invested round so manyâs chance to make a lifetime difference by so few. May all are souls be with every female and male knowledge worker of St James and the way they flow through Londonâs other 4 primary villages capable of world service that integrates every society around a map empowering 2 million global villages to blossom. May London accept the double challenge now set for it â by 2012 to innovate the first 100% carbon free Olympics and the greatest cross-cultural carnivalisation safe open cities of the 21st Century will need to revolve round unlike many 20th Century cities that extracted wealth instead of openly multiplying its abundance.
Please explain what happens to economic theory in the case of a global market where the cost of 6 billion being people having access to true information is more than all other costs of a particular new product? Why do you oppose the lifelong media experiences of those at beyond-branding in advocating that a global brand which spends a billion a year on image-making and nothing on reality-making can compound a healthy market sector? Which of your founder's values are you still editorialising and how do you respond to his wish that the paper should be closed if ever it his goals wetre ended? To what extent would you say a democratic government should be valued by how simply it facilitates the biggest change its peoples need to adapt through next if they are to sustain a better place? Which of Entrepeneurial Revolution scripts since your 1976 survey, or Intrapreneurial Now 1 2 revolutions of service economy are you still supporting? Do you understand exponential conseqeumces of systems and if so which of these market sectors whose productivities are evidently getting less in a Druckerian sense do you have any transformative veiws on that leaders should be openly asked to debate? Do you agree or disagree with your former editorial perspective on death of distance that woprld trade would need to go beyond that governed just by national politicians until ultimately it was capable of transparent network trades across up to 2 million global vilages (not all geographical)? What is the most fundamental governance difference between service economy and machine economy, and have you helped the world's largest organisations get over this revolution in the role of the leadership team? Do you have a top 5 of economists from other cultures that USA and if so what share of voice do they get in the worldwide discourse of economics that you mediate? Over long periods of time relevant to generational prosperity, do you agree that healthy societies compound strong economies not vice versa?
mail chris macrae at wcbn007@easynet.co.uk if you feel there is one question to edit in here or raise at a shareholder's meeting and I will see whether there's a way to vote for which question to ask economists concerned to support the Queens Mission of preventing globalisation from causing humanity to turn on iteslf...
Q:Why is St James an Unique London Village?
A: As transparency networks develop the maps of Club of City, ER's 30th birthday out of The Economist & Project30000 we see
EcoSaintJames mixes palaces and businesses. Its largest business is in the global media sector and co-mentoring transparent dialogue spaces - eg cafes, clubs - and practices of leadership-futures coordinated around The Economist; and storytelling people networks so that global vision and deep reality always keep working as neighbours. No commercial building in St James is permitted to be taller than The Economist for a rather unusual reason. There was a mid 20th Century concern that if skyscrapers started populating St James then people with telescopes might look in on Buckingham Palace's dressing rooms. The accidental rich property investment of The Economist's late 1950s building has premitted the paper to go global without any of the worst short-term pressures of advertisers distorting its exponential. It is perhaps the only commercial media constituted to enjoy questioning leaders' future views openly, rather than pander to their Press Releases. In this sustainable value of media, Britain has that other jewels in the crown: a Queen who asks all Britons and friends of Great Britain to make 2006 the year when WE ask: is humanity turning on itself?; the BBC as the world service and largest broadcaster owned by the people not by government's players or any other baron. St James' then is the other City where people of goodwill stand up for transparency and demand that the great sector visions of the world compound good for the sustainability of all peoples and societies, now revolutionary preneurs and beings live in a networked world where the peoples economics must-needs systemise hi-trust so we can all value multiply the most of human networking futures 1 2, and not the least that people can be. If leaders in EcoStJames cannot boldly go and take the OmniWorldView, then who in the world can? FutureofLondon & aSIN are ready and waiting for your guidance on that.
Chris Macrae, Roleplayer 7 of World Class Business Networks, wcbn007@easynet.co.uk
Vote for world leaders (discuss what they do)
Alive: Queen Elizabeth 2, PM Singh & Sonia Gandhi, Mandela Died in last 100 years: Mahatma Gandhi, Mr & Mrs King, Theresa, Pope John Paul 2
Are all of Londonâs boardrooms aware of the finding of the Chief Economist at the Work Foundation: if a company is continuously underperforming in the service economy, 90% of the time this is not a worker productivity crises but a management and system one. See Intrapreneurâs facilitation stories to understand what boardrooms do to multiply trust-flow and why no service is sustainable âlet alone economics â without this revolution in servant leadership
Local-Global debates : 1
continued lower down
Blog * Villager Notes
From the Networkers Guide to Citiesâ Villages
-we welcome collaboration suggestions on: how to improve practises of leaders and peoples who feel interconnected by this scriptâ¦chris macrae wcbn007@easynet.co.uk
Ecosaintjames is suitably placed to link together the palaces, clubs and gardens of old money to the longest term investment strategies that sustain the commonwealth of generations and nations. The speculative 20 something MBA that may be the darling of merchant bankers would quickly be seen through as a bubble waiting to burst.
Old money waves its advantageous flows interlocally and worldwide provided that the good and the deeply cross-cultural always have diverse social spaces to question the great. This is a quality that the worldâs biggest kingdom stewarded by queen , queen mothers and princesses has given Britain a curious power to do as its late 20th century learnt from the dreadful conflicts its 19th C Empire festered (sadly still lurking in many corrupting boundaries of who lords what in Africa to this day)
Whilst the United Kingdom and Ireland as historic lands tying the masses have been anything but united, they do now look more harmoniously bound to sustaining each otherâs greater futures than any cluster of European Union countries. This is not a thing for national leaders to boast about, rather an inspiration for all collaboration knowledge city netizens cheerled by ethical global ambassadors of the stature of Mary Robinson to collaboratively celebrate, as well as enjoy mapping how Death of Distance reconciliation revolves around spread of ethnicities worldwide and has so made the British invention of www a transparency searcherâs paradise.. My x times great grand father was a minister who tried to save the peoples of the Isle of Arran from a short term global accountant who advised the lord that sheep would be more profitable. The people walked from hours every Sunday, from all round the isle to commune - though some were exported to Australia for their troubles, a place where Scottish clans still thrive; and youth and professions plant humanityâs deepest collaboration networks permitting Londoners to linkin active branches 1 2. The next para may navigate how Eastern hemispheres of goodwill also resonate through London albeit in second looping ways that DNA helix patterns are known for.
On the Industrial revolutionâs global credit side: the English language remains the lingua franca of networks and software developers and the great good sense of Gandhi has sustained the transformation of Raj through Indiaâs cross-cultural independence to be the one country that I would love any child I advise to learn from most 1 2 . And who knows how entrepreneurial histories of China would have turned out if Hong Kong had not had enjoyed such an open opprtunity to be Chinese Asiaâs leading test village for bridging entrepreneurs from West and East, North and South.
During world war 2, Eisenhower used Norfolk House in ecosaintjames as its operational centre (see this Amazing grace with which GIâs were instructed in those days) and long after Winston Churchill was know to swim at the RAC club in Pall mall (one of the first indoor pools sported by a club)
The modern day tourist may love :the royal parks â I never understood the exuberance of Wordsworths; daffodils until I met the tall wild kind one spring day in Green Park. The ceremonies of lands of hope and glory still fan out of Buckingham place. The 3 church boulevards that Buckingham palace almost forms the roundabout of : Victoria Cathedral , Westminster Abbey and furthers away St Pauls, and recently a new innovation : the Ministry of Peace constituted with the support of simultaneous policy advocates and others to sit one evening a month at the Houses of Parliament.
By serendipity (or maybe the Rothschilds looking after their money further than any one generation can see ) , The Economist moved in the early 60s? from the media centre Londonâs collaboration networks dub the Future of London âthat end of Fleet street where lay the HQ of BBC (worldâs largest public broadcaster), a building shared with Londonâs jewel in the crown gateway (Indiaâs embassy), around whose Somerset House where births were recorded and constitutional law drafted, where London Schooled economists to StJames.
Ecosaintjames got off to an uneasy start when it was found that a skyscraperâs roof the height of The Economistâs new building could be a direct line of telescope sight to the Royal bedrooms. Privacy was granted but by decree no other building in St James would be built so high again, and the key to the roof to be kept in the editorâs safe. This lucky matter ensured that The Economistâs tangible property was always wealthy enough to ensure its journalists were never beholden to short-term pressures of advertising monies. Their inquiring zeal was free to question global powers unlike any other newspaper medium. So, The Economist continued what it had been founded around by James Wilson in the 1840s â the first and allcomers greatest media social entrepreneur : the peoples economics may never win a Nobel prize but unlike many academics it is never funded to develop the dismal science economics school of maths designed around compounding how the big get bigger.
Friday luncheons, after Thursdayâs bedding of the weekly newspaper, also became an institution where almost any world leader of national or corporate complexion visiting town could revel in a private debate with off-the-record editorial teams. Moreover, the collegiate (non individually branded) writings of The Economist enabled a different style than individuals making a name for themselves. Some of these styles of exuberant curiosity have sustained over many decades and lifetimes: Matt (now Viscount) Ridleyâs open inquiries of science being what any school teacher should link curricula to; Future history and social entrepreneurial revolution journalism have never had a greater archives from foundation of The Economist to the 1980s when the final death of distance preneurial revolutions were chartered for one and all to explore as the 1984-2024 generation takes the final test in sustaining investment in humanity
This brings us 2005: the year that âdeath of distance scenario debatesâ since 1984 have forecast as manâs most dangerous , the final crossroads in deciding whether to make extreme poverty history. And why the Queens end of 2005 Commonwealth speech needs to be re-read with due diligence when she asks is humanity turing on itself. After 2005, London will redouble ist efforts to earn its current leading worldwide role as collaboration knowledge city.
When we look now at the few in Ecosaintjames, assisted by such extraordinary commonwealth waves as the Canadian-born architectural network of photosynthesis as the clean energy that can change the worldâs footprint at a stroke- who are deeply planting sustainability investment today, we may wonder whether for once Winston was only half right- never in the history of human kind has so much been invested round so manyâs chance to make a lifetime difference by so few. May all are souls be with every female and male knowledge worker of St James and the way they flow through Londonâs other 4 primary villages capable of world service that integrates every society around a map empowering 2 million global villages to blossom. May London accept the double challenge now set for it â by 2012 to innovate the first 100% carbon free Olympics and the greatest cross-cultural carnivalisation safe open cities of the 21st Century will need to revolve round unlike many 20th Century cities that extracted wealth instead of openly multiplying its abundance.
Q:Why is St James an Unique London Village?
A: As transparency networks develop the maps of Club of City, ER's 30th birthday out of The Economist & Project30000 we see
EcoSaintJames mixes palaces and businesses. Its largest business is in the global media sector and co-mentoring transparent dialogue spaces - eg cafes, clubs - and practices of leadership-futures coordinated around The Economist; and storytelling people networks so that global vision and deep reality always keep working as neighbours. No commercial building in St James is permitted to be taller than The Economist for a rather unusual reason. There was a mid 20th Century concern that if skyscrapers started populating St James then people with telescopes might look in on Buckingham Palace's dressing rooms. The accidental rich property investment of The Economist's late 1950s building has premitted the paper to go global without any of the worst short-term pressures of advertisers distorting its exponential. It is perhaps the only commercial media constituted to enjoy questioning leaders' future views openly, rather than pander to their Press Releases. In this sustainable value of media, Britain has that other jewels in the crown: a Queen who asks all Britons and friends of Great Britain to make 2006 the year when WE ask: is humanity turning on itself?; the BBC as the world service and largest broadcaster owned by the people not by government's players or any other baron. St James' then is the other City where people of goodwill stand up for transparency and demand that the great sector visions of the world compound good for the sustainability of all peoples and societies, now revolutionary preneurs and beings live in a networked world where the peoples economics must-needs systemise hi-trust so we can all value multiply the most of human networking futures 1 2, and not the least that people can be. If leaders in EcoStJames cannot boldly go and take the OmniWorldView, then who in the world can? FutureofLondon & aSIN are ready and waiting for your guidance on that.
Chris Macrae, Roleplayer 7 of World Class Business Networks, wcbn007@easynet.co.uk
Vote for world leaders (discuss what they do)
About Me
- Name: chris macrae
- Location: United Kingdom
Yunus10000dvd dialogue starts fall08-ask for your own dvd -chris usa tel 301 881 1655 grameen.tv , worldcitizen.tv, valuetrue.com brand chartering GoogleGroups
Previous Posts
- Quiz on The Economist 1) Where did the founder of...
- New editor of The Economist, @ testing time like n...
- Occasional conversations around Value Exchange The...
- Dr Yunus of Grameen and microcredit and Nobel pea...
- Continuing Threads Economics of Waves, - including...
- Europe-wide peoples and angels 1 2 3 questions to ...
- To decide whether the economics of Saint James (a ...
- Delhi GRN 2004, Gandhi 2007
- In 2007 our new book com es out on how Economics h...
- Around now, The Economist holds its AGM? What ques...


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home